From June 6th, 2012 to January 1st, 2018, 29% user give 5-star rating, 29% user give 4-star rating, 43% user give 3-star rating. for ImageX chrome extension.
This extension changes the content settings for the website address, and thus chrome will not render the images. Would be good if "enabling images" would remove the page from the blacklist without whitelisting it as well.
Cool but can we get it to remove the element so that the space that the picture had previously taken is compacted to have a shorter page / migrate the text or content closer to each other? Kinda like the difference when using chrome developer tools if you inspect and object then hit hide the image will vanish but the space will remain, like here.. But if you hit remove element it will lose the space until next refresh? What do you think boss?
Awesome and very handy for some sites... :) Thanks a lot developer!!!
Great to save internet quota limit, disable all images by default, and enable this extension whenever you want to image on a page.
hiding all images is requested by default optionally
There needs to be a setting to toggle it between per-tab (how Opera's cached image mode and no image mode works) and globally (like how Firefox's ImageBlock extension works) I do like how it automatically loads images after re-enabling them. Unfortunately it does not reload them from cache, so the images need to be re-downloaded, which wastes bandwidth. Another problem is that it seems to be site-based, which means that if I block images on a site in one tab, another tab showing the identical website will also automatically hide the images, meaning you cannot compare the two, and worse, if you close the tabs, then re-open a new tab and navigate to the website again, images will automatically be blocked. This would be fine if it was optional, but currently it is the only method, which is somewhat clumsy to use. It also seems to be domain based, which means if I open a link to a different domain in a background tab, the new tab won't block images. This is a bad thing.
Does the job. I'd like the option to have it globally block images on all websites (or not, depending if the button is depressed). I'm using it to keep my internet consumption low when I'm reading news at work.