Reviews & Comments of Ghost Inspector - Web Test Recorder chrome extension

From May 12th, 2014 to June 25th, 2022, 60% user give 5-star rating, 20% user give 4-star rating, 20% user give 1-star rating. for Ghost Inspector - Web Test Recorder chrome extension.

Reviews of ghost inspector - web test recorder:


Isaiah Odhner June 25th, 2022
Isaiah Odhner

Reloaded all my tabs (without asking), all at once, freezing up my computer for a couple minutes and losing my work. This happened just after logging into the extension.


Monica Alma Ramirez April 16th, 2019
Monica Alma Ramirez

This isn't such a good recorder. I also don't like the fact that Ghost Inspector only offers headless browsers on Linux servers. I think Endtest is way better.


Priyavrathan Sathyavrathan December 20th, 2018
Priyavrathan Sathyavrathan

Great Tool in test automation. Recording a test and running it as such or after editing the steps is a great capability of the programme. Further jump from Selenium. Scheduling a test is advantages as the situation may demand a daily test or hourly test. CSV upload of inputs is definitely an extra advantage. All together, it is a great tool.


Earl Gray September 5th, 2017
Earl Gray

Really great tool - even better now you can record and add additional steps to an existing test


Alex June 30th, 2017
Alex

nice job


Gareth Mawdsley March 8th, 2017
Gareth Mawdsley

A fantastic tool that has massively benefited our approach to automated web testing. Thanks Justin


Saif Harbia October 14th, 2015
Saif Harbia

I'm very grateful to ghost inspector tool, it has great features that summarize effort and time, but I think it needs enhancement on some perspectives so it can become #1 on this scope. Having said that, I'm sending this email to provide you with some recommendations upon my usage of this tool, I hope that you can reach them out to the developers 1- When I'm done recording the steps and click 'View your test', it will be much better if it doesn't execute the test again, it should leave that as an option for the user. 2-Also, and more importantly, I don't see it very useful to execute the test directly on the webpage, that is so exhausting and can cause losses of data when the test doesn't execute properly. Rather than that, I recommend the developer to create a duplicate or a copy of the current tested page. It can also be that the tool returns back to the pre-test state after executing the test in order to not change anything on the webpage, any of the two options can work. I hope you take my words into consideration.


Boris Pavlov September 9th, 2015
Boris Pavlov

good one


Michael Johnston May 12th, 2014
Michael Johnston

I'm in love with this extension.


Andy Hagans May 12th, 2014
Andy Hagans

Easy to use.